For tactical gear manufacturers
This guide breaks down key technical differences, cost considerations, and use cases to help you make data-driven decisions.
What is X-PAC Fabric?
X-PAC is a laminated composite fabric engineered for high-performance applications. Its layered construction includes:
Outer Layer : Nylon or polyester for abrasion resistance.
Middle Layer : A waterproof polyester or polyethylene film.
Inner Layer : X-Ply reinforcement (cross-ply polyester or Vectran® threads) to prevent tear propagation.
This design delivers built-in waterproofing, exceptional tear resistance, and a lightweight profile—ideal for tactical gear requiring durability without added bulk.
X-PAC vs. Competitors: Critical Attributes for Manufacturers
We’ll compare X-PAC to Cordura, Dyneema, and Ripstop Nylon across 5 key factors affecting production and performance.
1. Weight-to-Strength Ratio
Fabric Weight (oz/yd²) Key Strength Best Application X-PAC (330D) 4.9 Tear resistance (X-Ply) Backpacks, vests, pouches Cordura (1000D) 10 Abrasion resistance High-wear areas (straps, bases) Dyneema (SB51) 3.5 Strength-to-weight (UHMWPE) Cut-resistant gear, armor Ripstop Nylon 1.1 (30D) Lightweight tear resistance Budget gear, liners
Takeaway:
X-PAC offers the best balance of weight and tear resistance for most tactical gear.
Pair with Cordura in high-abrasion zones for hybrid durability.
2. Water Resistance & Production Efficiency
Fabric Waterproof? Coatings Required? Production Impact X-PAC Yes (film layer) None Reduces labor/cost Cordura No PU/DWR Adds 5–8/yd in coatings Dyneema No Varies by type Limited waterproof options Ripstop Nylon No DWR Frequent reapplication
Takeaway:
X-PAC’s built-in waterproofing eliminates post-production treatments, streamlining manufacturing and reducing defect risks.
3. Durability & Compliance
Fabric Key Advantage Compliance Weakness X-PAC MIL-SPEC tear resistance IPX6, MIL-STD-810G Moderate abrasion resistance Cordura ASTM D3884 abrasion Military-grade certifications Heavy, not waterproof Dyneema Cut resistance (ISO 13997) NIJ standards (armor) High cost, sewing challenges Ripstop Nylon Cost-effective Limited certifications Poor long-term durability
Takeaway :
X-PAC meets IPX6 and MIL-STD-810G standards, ideal for contracts requiring certified waterproofing and tear resistance.
4. Cost Analysis
Fabric Material Cost/yd Labor/Coatings Cost/yd Total Cost/yd X-PAC $20 $0 $20 Cordura + PU $12 $8 $20 Dyneema $75 $10 (specialized sewing) $85 Ripstop Nylon $6 $4 $10
Note : While X-PAC and Cordura + PU have similar total costs, X-PAC reduces complexity and coating-related defects.
5. Best Applications
Fabric Ideal For Avoid For X-PAC Waterproof tactical packs, medical pouches, field-ready vests Gear requiring extreme abrasion resistance Cordura Backpack bases, MOLLE straps, heavy-duty workwear Ultralight designs Dyneema Ballistic panels, cut-resistant gloves, ultralight specialty gear High-volume production Ripstop Nylon Budget gear liners, disposable covers Long-term field use
Why Manufacturers Choose X-PAC
X-PAC’s laminated film eliminates PU/DWR coatings, reducing:
Labor costs: No post-production treatments.
Defect risks: Coatings can peel or degrade over time.
The cross-ply reinforcement stops punctures from compromising gear integrity—critical for mission-critical equipment.
Pre-laminated X-PAC ensures uniform quality across batches, unlike variable generic nylons (e.g., Kodra).
At 4.9 oz/yd² (330D), X-PAC is 50% lighter than 1000D Cordura, reducing shipping costs and improving end-user mobility.
Partner with LQ ARMY for X-PAC Tactical Gear
LQ ARMY military-grade backpacks to weatherproof pouches
Our services include:
Custom Solutions : Tailor denier, color, and laminate layers to your design.
Prototyping & Testing : Ensure compliance with MIL-SPEC, IPX6, or custom standards.
Bulk Pricing : Competitive rates for high-volume orders with rapid turnaround.
Get in touch with us to explore how we can assist you.
